CHILLY-PHEESE-STEAK'S PROFILE

author=AngelicBrat09
:) thanks so much for the help ^.^ i appreciate it.

You're welcome glad I could help.

I'd need to see it motion to really give you a good opinion but like LockeZ mentioned I think you added way to many filters to everything.

author=PepsiOtaku
You more or less have the right idea. Start with this:
Set a variable from 0 to 100
Check the variable if it's above or below a certain point ( <= 30 would be 30%)

Then you can modify that as you see fit. A number from 0 to 1000 would be the equivalent of using a % with 1 decimal place, or 0 to 10 would be % increments of 10.

I've given this a try and I'll admit it seems to work better than the method I was using before. I'm still getting doubles way more often than I'd like but hedge's advice below may have helped with that.

author=hedge1
Try this once just to see if there's something else at work here. Change your "Hero Acc" variable to be set not 1..30 but rather something like 2..30. Since you only "miss" if you roll a 1, changing your randomized values like that means that you should never, in a million tries, ever miss. Thus if you ever do miss you know that the number is getting altered or re-randomized elsewhere.

One possibility is that parallel process events do run in parallel, which means that one script can mess up another script.

I tried it and like you mentioned no misses came up. I double checked and no parallel processes were using that variable in anyway. I was using that variable in other formulas but that shouldn't have mattered since I re-rolled it at the beginning of every attack. Either way I changed it to a different variable altogether and it seems to have fixed the double missing issue.


This is what I'm using now. Thanks for the help guys.

Is there a better way I could code a percentage chance of something happening? Or better yet is there a way to improve RM2k3's RNG? I've searched the forums and google but almost of the the topics more or less were debates on where RNG is good or bad.


This is the chance of a normal attack missing and more often than not it happens once a test battle (which average about 3 turns per battle) and even worse if a miss happens it usually happens on the next turn despite the variable getting re rolled twice.


This is how I'm setting up it my percentages. (Ignore the faded bits.) Am I doing something wrong or do you think there's no problem?

I really only like flavor text when every weapon is more or less the same. I mean if an iron sword and a steel sword only differ in color and a few points in attack then flavor it up. But if you doing things like weapons that double attack or poison on hit I'd rather the description tell me a special effect instead.