MORTETORMENT'S PROFILE

Sorry, but what did you mean then?

And yeah, when I go through the 15 games that I plan to go into, I'll probably jump to more recent games.

Edit: Oh, and a couple things.

First of all, thanks for being nothing but nice people. I realize that yeah, this is a weird situation.

Second of all, we kinda got a bit off of the topic that I really wanted feedback on. I was looking for feedback on how I've planned the rule of three.

You guys bring up a big reason why I want to do this.

Yes, more recent games have certain features that much older game won't have, and to me that's all the more reason why I want to play games that were put on around the beginning of this sites lifetime, so I can still enjoy them.

Oh, and as for feedback, are you mainly referring to dealing with glitches and such?

Edit: Oh, and a couple things.

First of all, thanks for being nothing but nice people. I realize that yeah, this is a weird situation.

Second of all, we kinda got a bit off of the topic that I really wanted feedback on. I was looking for feedback on how I've planned the rule of three.


Ok, so it's like this.

I decided a while ago that for the moment I'm going to focus on games that were put on this site in its first year or so.

I already decided how I choose what RPGs to give at least a fair couple hours start, specifically based on skimming reviews of games that have at least a 2.5 rating or higher, to see if it sounded particularly interesting, but I wasn't sure how I'd decide the order in which I would go through them.

I came up with what I think is a good system, but that there's also something that could be improved upon it.

Anyways, the system is like this:

I'm going to only play 3 RPGs at a time. 1 RPG I'll mainly be playing for its writing, and 2 RPGs where I'm mainly playing for the gameplay, or 1 for the gameplay, and 1 with something specifically bizarre in a good way going for it.

So, how does the system sound? I welcome all suggestions.

Thank you for your time.

Oh, and in case you're curious about what projects I'm currently focusing on:

Writing: 2k: O N Y X: 20 Hour RPG, Combat seems unbalanced, but the dialogue is quite entertaining so far.

Gameplay: 2k3: Hero's Realm (15 hr?) FFV type game, Seemed insanely promising, and so far it has delivered where reviews said it would.

Bizarre: 2k3: Final Fantasy Dreams unknown hour(long?) Combo of several FF games. Horrid dialogue, but combat has some of the best visual novelty I've seen in a game.

author=Sailerius
Why does the engine matter? A game is a game.

I already explained why it matters. As for the A game is a game, I don't go for that at all. A true work of art can be truly extraordinary.

BTW, this has gone on long enough. Most of you seem to think that I'm a troll, and won't even listen to me when I try to convince you otherwise.

Look, I'm sorry guys, please believe me. If I make any more topics discussing my opinion, I'll make it very clear that it's just my opinion. I wasn't looking for a flame war.

I just have one question.

Why do you need 50 grand for this?