BLIND'S PROFILE
Blind
2262
Search
Filter
Screenshot Survival 20XX
author=Tau
Mapping itself looks good.
There's something...a bit garish about those tiles, but I can't put my finger on it. XD Do you think you'd start a new/short project in MV?
President Trump
A president-elect who has no need for intelligence briefings but can apparently make time for Kanye West. You truly can't make this shit up.




Final Fantasy XV
author=Skie FortressYeah, I gotcha. I researched it a bit more and I think you nailed it on the head. XD
From what I understand, all of that city footage was cut and put into Kingsglaive. Noctis and his buddies were shunted out onto a field trip to miss the whole thing, while Nomura's initial designs were to have them in the thick of the Niflheim invasion.
It's a bit more boring imo, and it cuts out a huge chunk of the backstory to a movie you'll have to pay to see. But heeeey.
I'm about twelve hours in...it's a very different sort of Final Fantasy. Most of the main "storytelling" - if you could even call it that, feels very opaque or in the background. I knew the focus would be on Noctis and the party etc...but I didn't realize just how far they were going to take that concept.
Even the game itself, doesn't feel like it takes seriously the events and backstory, if that makes sense - those cutscenes are thrown in very rarely and sporadcally. (And when they do happen, it seems out of left field.) Most of the dialogue in this game is delivered through silly one-liners or side-quests. Perhaps that's the route they needed to go in order to "modernize" Final Fantasy and reinvigorate the franchise; but I also feel like it loses something, too.
On the other hand, I appreciate they at least *tried* to sculpt a larger plot...versus something like Skyrim. Taken solely as a gameplay experience, FFXV is very very enjoyable. You grow to love the combat the longer you play. The environments are gorgeous (if repetitive), and Yoko Shinomura even did a good job filling in for Uematsu.
I'm also not the typical player I guess XD I grew up with the older paradigm of jRPG and maybe I'll always be partial to it. If their goal was to attract a wider audience, and experiment with a new direction for the franchise, they definitely succeeded. I've heard the later half becomes more narrative-focused, so I'll hold off on giving any larger opinions.
Final Fantasy XV
author=SgtMettool
Picked it up today and put about 3-4 hours into it.
(Earlygame Spoilers)Does... anyone else feel like a huge chunk of the story was cut? As much fun as I've having doing fights and listening to the boys banter in the desert, the game plops you into the open world so quickly without setting up the world and characters that I feel like I'm missing something. Like I was supposed to watch Kingsglaive and Brotherhood to get the full experience.
It's a very weird and uncomfortable feeling. I don't know how I feel about this format of storytelling.
Wow, interesting. XD
When the project switched directors and was revitalized as FFXV, I think that's when the focus seems to have drastically shifted to the open-world format. Nomura took it more in the direction of Final Fantasy/Kingdom Hearts tropes, whereas Tabata gave it more of the "Western" and pseudo-realistic identity that we now see in the finished game. But yeah, having watched the first few hours on YouTube, it leads me to believe if there was a lot of plot-building (like the first few hours of FFVII) that may have been cut out.
There's footage around 3:02 from the VsXIII days that doesn't appear in the game at all, to my knowledge. (I haven't played yet)
Final Fantasy XV
Wow, I haven't seen a cheesy live-action commercial for a jRPG since...I don't remember. XD
Has anyone bought/played this yet?!
Has anyone bought/played this yet?!
President Trump
author=harmonic
...What I don't understand is why I'm being told that the KKK is bad. I didn't mean to make them out to be a non-issue, just that they don't have any influence on our culture/politics. It's like westboro baptist church. No one likes them. We all know the KKK is bad.
I don't think the very real rise in racial tensions surrounding Trump's messaging is something that should be so easily dismissed/forgiven. I'd concede your point that the KKK is "fringe" ...but the fact that they're rearing their heads up so publicly at all, prolongs and empowers lingering white supremacy. Trump's campaign team isn't foolish--they knew the white/rural vote would push them over the edge and they very intentionally exploited that. Whether or not he himself believes those ideas is mostly irrelevant - the damage is done.
Some of it is an unsurprising "backlash" against the SJW/neo-liberal kind of rhetoric, but that doesn't mean it should be tolerated.
President Trump
author=Solitayreauthor=harmonicWe all saw what happened the other night. You say we live in a bubble and turned a blind eye to everything, but I live in the heart of the Rust Belt. My family is exactly the kind of disaffected manufacturing demographic Trump should have appealed to. You know that I myself was unemployed for many years. I know exactly how they feel. Many people in my family voted Trump. I think they were, very, very wrong to do so, and are going to be betrayed, but I understand why.
Wow BM I uh.... didn't expect this level of candor I gotta admit. Well said.
They will be betrayed, without any doubt. Trump struck a cord with that demographic - but 95% of it was entirely hollow. Most of those manufacturing jobs are NEVER returning to the United States in the way he so eagerly boasts about. Automation, technology, and simply our "new" economy is not going away, nor is multiculturalism. Entire industries and labor-driven jobs will continue to vanish or significantly change, without having any kind of clear successor.
His isolationist, "back to basics" point-of-view has a clear appeal for people who feel disenfranchised (similarly to Bernie), a lot of families in rural/white America...but his campaign is entirely devoid of actual solutions. This is where liberals need to reach across the line, try to empathize with the existential fears, and come up with real answers.
Why do you make RM games?
If you're a non-programmer, RPGMaker (or programs like it) are the easiest "canvas" to execute full control over your art, your project's vision. It's simple, intuitive, and still (IMO) quite underrated. Plus, most people don't have the patience or desire to understand the technical aspects...they just want to create their game.
RPGMaker does have its limitations (especially 2000-2003 and below), but there's also a certain charm that comes from creating a compelling experience within those confines. The wider your scope gets, the harder it becomes to maintain polish and quality-control.
Plus, there's the obvious nostalgia factor. XD Rm2k3 is the simplest way to create SNES-looking aesthetics without much work.
RPGMaker does have its limitations (especially 2000-2003 and below), but there's also a certain charm that comes from creating a compelling experience within those confines. The wider your scope gets, the harder it becomes to maintain polish and quality-control.
Plus, there's the obvious nostalgia factor. XD Rm2k3 is the simplest way to create SNES-looking aesthetics without much work.
President Trump
author=slash
And so I'd argue: these are people worth talking to on a real, personal, critical level. Empathize with their thought process and get them to empathize with you. Some people will never change their minds, but... These are people we share the world with, and I believe communication and critical discussion will help create the bonds we need going forward. Take care of yourself and the people around you who need help, first. But, there is a gap to be bridged, and a bridge that needs building. I can't count on anyone else to build it for us.
Yeah, agreed completely.
If we demonize people only by virtue of voting Trump, we're no better than they are. It's the same as insinuating all Hillary voters stand behind her years of shady hypocrisy, the corporatist agenda, etc. It's simply not true - so to take that stance is a bit dehumanizing/reductive. We have to be willing to listen, and bring the moderates to the side of civility and empathy.
There was a very real, tangible basis for a demagogue like Trump to appear, that some liberals underestimate. He appealed to the mounting populist outcry, their working-class struggle, and in some cases, the rejection of multiculturalism in America. By comparison, Hillary had almost zero appeal for true liberals, progressives, and populist working-class. They simply didn't buy into her schtick.
President Trump
author=Dyhaltoauthor=halibabicaThe problem with Bernie, and with Occupy too if you remember it, is that all he wanted to do was make a statement. It's ridiculous. The only goal in politics is to take power. Trying to do anything less is a halfhearted effort, and apparently we're supposed to be glad for Bernie doing what he did. Screw that. He's a coward and should be forever branded as one.
He wasn't just campaigning against Clinton, but the entire corrupt system. He wanted to show that a campaign could be run with legitimate tactics instead of underhanded mud-slinging and media payoffs.
Do you really blame Bernie for this mess? Do you actually suspect his end-goal was that narrow?
There's no question he was cowardly to so readily concede to the Clinton powerhouse...but I think it's pretty likely he didn't have a choice. They probably threatened his political credibility, offered bribes, placed threats, etc. He didn't focus on dirty or manipulative tactics as much he should have during the primary - I'll give you that much.
The leadership of DNC itself deserves the largest degree of blame IMO. The way in which they commandeered this election was morally irresponsible - and now we can see the sad result.














