HARMONIC'S PROFILE
Search
Filter
Have you played Final Fantasy I? Why not?
Old guy here so yeah.
First time I played was like the year 1990. My older brother had a party of 4 black belts whose names were in all caps, all named after drugs. I think they were named ACID, LSD!, CRAK, and METH.
He did not beat the game. He gave up at the ice cave when he was too high to figure out how to revive party members.
Then I played a game with Fighter, Red Mage, White Mage, Black Mage, which is one of the "recommended" top tier set ups and grinded all the way to level 50 fighting Warmech and other monsters around there.
In my older age, I went back and did solo runs. I've beaten it with solo characters for every class except Thief and Black Mage, which I believe to be impossible without life-wasting levels of save scumming :(
Fighter, Black Belt, and Red Mage I knew would be easy, and it was. White Mage was also surprisingly easy, though less so.
First time I played was like the year 1990. My older brother had a party of 4 black belts whose names were in all caps, all named after drugs. I think they were named ACID, LSD!, CRAK, and METH.
He did not beat the game. He gave up at the ice cave when he was too high to figure out how to revive party members.
Then I played a game with Fighter, Red Mage, White Mage, Black Mage, which is one of the "recommended" top tier set ups and grinded all the way to level 50 fighting Warmech and other monsters around there.
In my older age, I went back and did solo runs. I've beaten it with solo characters for every class except Thief and Black Mage, which I believe to be impossible without life-wasting levels of save scumming :(
Fighter, Black Belt, and Red Mage I knew would be easy, and it was. White Mage was also surprisingly easy, though less so.
RPG Maker developers who went on to produce games professionally
Skyborn's how I got "known" enough to break into the "real" game industry. Then I got bored making other peoples' games and am back to doing my own thing XD
President Trump
The problem with the popular vote, (problem or purpose depending on your outlook) is that California would then rule the entire country. In this case, Trump lost California by over 4 million votes. He could have lost it by just 100 votes and the electoral college result would be the same. But if you take away California, Trump actually won the popular vote by about 2 million votes.
President Trump
author=Link_2112
How is it not bait if it's coming out of nowhere, not a direct response to anybody, seemingly addresses everybody "you", and is bringing up a previous post? Which previous post? Was that previous post negative? It clearly got a negative response from people. How could you not realize it might cause a problem. It totally comes off as douchey, moreso without context. If you have no intention of bickering, why post such a pointless and provocative thing? Considering how this thread has been going it doesn't seem like you are trying to avoid conflict. It seems like you know the climate here and said it on purpose to get a rise out of people. If it was meant as a joke, it's not a good one. I have no bias towards you and I don't care about the actual topic of this thread, I'm just saying how it looks to an outsider on neither side of this debate.
And now your shields are up, so I'm probably wasting my time.
Okay friends, I'm going to answer his questions. See his questions? Going to answer them objectively. They were asked in a guilty until proven innocent way, which makes this difficult, so please consider that. I am entitled to defend myself against these accusations and it will not involve baiting or bickering.
No, it was not bait. Why would I do that at this point? I'm under the microscope now.
No, it's not coming out of no where. I made a post earlier about the various ways elements of the left (no, not everyone on the left...okay?) trying to overturn the election.
Said post was not negative. It was on topic. You may disagree with it, but that doesn't make it negative.
No, it wasn't a dig at anyone. Why would I do that at this point? I'm under the microscope now.
No, it didn't get a "negative response" it got an opposed response which is fine.
No, it didn't "cause a problem." It caused disagreement, which is fine.
How is "licking your chops" provocative? Don't you think saying "I'm probably wasting my time" is provocative?
No, I'm not "trying to get a rise out of people." Why would I do that at this point? I'm under the microscope now.
In summary, literally every assertion and assumption in your post was inaccurate and unfair.
There. Answered his questions.
Now for my question.
Why, after everything that's happened, do you feel the need to do yet another public call out directed at me? This thread is not called the Harmonic call out thread. I brought up a legitimate topic about the FBI thing today, you ignored that, and came after me. The public call out thing has been warned against several times in this topic, yet, it continues.
President Trump
author=Link_2112
'licking your chops' talk? Who is it directed at? And what is it trying to say/accomplish?
There's no point. It's nothing. It's a reference to a previous post. It's not bait, it's not anything. Fuck's sake.
Thread beyond repair. Let's Lock 'er up!
Wait I didn't mean any offense by "Lock 'er up" it was just an expression
President Trump
Baiting? Jesus, who would be baited by that? Who has that much of an itchy trigger finger on the personal attack button?? Wait...
Anyway, SORRY.
On topic.
The FBI thinks Russia hacked. So maybe licking your chops will yield something this time. Damn Russians...
Anyway, SORRY.
On topic.
The FBI thinks Russia hacked. So maybe licking your chops will yield something this time. Damn Russians...
President Trump
Okay! I've been instructed by the RMN gods to report insult posts instead of responding to them.
The question I have is are their inboxes ready for this shit?
The question I have is are their inboxes ready for this shit?
President Trump
author=Jeroen_Sol
Listen harmonic. I agree there's been a lot of unneeded flak thrown your way and people have been insulting you, which is not helpful.
But this:author=harmonicis pretty hard to swallow. In this thread, half of your posts have been accusing "liberals" or "the mainstream left" of this and that, even after numerous people here, on various occasions, have explained that what you are describing is a vocal minority at best, and completely non-existant at worst. So I hope you can see why people get fed up with you if you keep saying the same things over and over again, even after people try to tell you that what you're saying is wholly unreasonable.
Just pointing out reality and facts.
Now all of this isn't meant as an insult, and I won't defend the way people have treated you, but I hope you see why they have, and I hope you'll finally realize there's no such thing as the liberal boogeyman.
When I said I was pointing out reality and facts in that quote, I'm referring to the modus operandi of me stating opinion, and someone gets onery and decides to throw shit at me, make it personal, etc.
That said, thank you for actually arguing the topic and not calling me a stinky butt face.
I will say, though, you're not going to convince a person of anything if your tactic is to gaslight them. Can you point out specific things I've said that you think absolutely don't exist? I'll give you that many of them, possibly most of them, are a vocal minority.
President Trump
I have no intention of "bickering" with anyone. Absolutely none of these little "feuds" have been initiated by me. I simply respond to them. It's Cave, Ratty, ESBY, etc who are in the mood to "bicker" with me. I did not invite them to insult and provoke me.
I mean let's not even over dramatize this. There's no feud, that implies that there's some sort of passionate two-way exchange. There isn't. It's just dumb pot shots at the person whose opinion is the minority in the group.
I make a point, I get called stupid, paranoid, delusional, etc, my opinions get dismissed, then I respond. (Not maudlin. Not even complaining. Just pointing out reality and facts. Go back and find every one of those insults directed at me.)
I understand it's "good moderation" to say everyone is dumb and needs to shut up, but if no one throws shit at me, I wouldn't throw shit back. I would absolutely love it if there was no bickering. Life's too short for that shit. So stop bickering with me. You know who you are.
Maybe imagine me as my adorable cat and it will curb your urge to take another pot shot. How could you hate that little furball?
I mean let's not even over dramatize this. There's no feud, that implies that there's some sort of passionate two-way exchange. There isn't. It's just dumb pot shots at the person whose opinion is the minority in the group.
I make a point, I get called stupid, paranoid, delusional, etc, my opinions get dismissed, then I respond. (Not maudlin. Not even complaining. Just pointing out reality and facts. Go back and find every one of those insults directed at me.)
I understand it's "good moderation" to say everyone is dumb and needs to shut up, but if no one throws shit at me, I wouldn't throw shit back. I would absolutely love it if there was no bickering. Life's too short for that shit. So stop bickering with me. You know who you are.
Maybe imagine me as my adorable cat and it will curb your urge to take another pot shot. How could you hate that little furball?
President Trump
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
there's been no conversation in here ever. its basically impossible when one party is only concerned with starting fires via willful misinterpretation and is given carte blanche to do so.
Basically, you have a problem with Soli moderating direct personal insults (btw, thanks for being fair, Soli.) And you prefer that they moderate my opinions for being not the right opinions.














