THATBENNYGUY'S PROFILE

Updated.

I think they're looking for a system like imdb, where many users can pitch in on ratings to provide an overall rating that best represents the public's opinion on a game. Also, if you have many ratings, you can sort it a micro level, for example showing the difference between a 3.82 rated game and a 3.72 game. One button and you'll have all the games ranked from best to worst. A comprehensive fan-based voting system that can determine the best of the best. The big question is whether greatness in RMN games can actually be determined on a mass scale, or if it should only be specific to individual opinion.

Things like vote stuffing can be combatted by only counting the votes of frequent users, but it may still be unreliable. I still think it could be implemented as a little feature, a little number in the description like Liberty said. Those who are interested can filter their results by it, but it's by no means a major thing. It doesn't mean anything in the end, except people's general view of what's great and what's quality. Separating the user scores from the critical scores is done on many other sites such as IMDb and Metacritic, or Rotten Tomatoes for film, games, music, TV and other media.

I think it could work here, but if the mods clearly don't want it, we shouldn't try to bully them into submission. I think it'd be a helpful device, but all in all it's implementation difficulty + personal choice + mod desire to keep the site a certain way, which should be completely fine.

I like reviews.

The floor just looks a bit random and iffy, gourd. Not sure if it looks that way when you zoom, though. Also, there's those beams that go over the rails that look like they have 0 thickness. Perhaps edit the tlie so that there is a little thickness indicator to how thick those beams can be? It's very imaginative though, I'll give you that.

Could you please play my short puzzle game Quincy and Amber? It's only 5 minutes, but it'll be a fun diversion, trust me.