BIZARREMONKEY'S PROFILE

author=Liberty
I'd say BM lost since he's never played Hero's Realm from the sounds of it.

Oh yeah!?

Well, you!!!

Are a butt..
So Hah! How do ya like that!?

author=Liberty
No, you need to have donated to the site before. If you had one before that it's probably because kentona gave you one.

I was given one for being a good sport about something, but then I started donating anyway.

I think having colors like blue and orange that greatly contradict frog's color is a good idea because it makes elements of the game very clear.

To add to Sated's thesis. You don't call me a furry despite being the Bizarre Monkey.

You don't call Ed from Ed, Edd' n' Eddy a furry because he likes animals or wore a wolf pelt one time.

The only time you are a furry is when you pronounce yourself as one. It's a label, and comes with its gimmicks. Don't make the mistake of confusing Animal Lovers with Furries, or I will bury you into the Earth.

I have no problems with furries as a choice of life some people take, I have two friends, one who even draws anthropomorphic porn and shows me. I don't mind because I know it's what he loves and I have a big enough pair of testicles to be able to look at it, and give him feedback if it's due, or just say it looks stunning.

I'd never draw that kind of art myself, but I won't abhor it, the only time I'll have a problem with a furry is when you try to make it my problem. Otherwise, we're cool.

Now, I'm obviously an animal lover, three of my games prominently feature domesticated pets that talk. Some even wear clothes. Does that make me a furry, I don't know! But I'd never seek to apply that label to myself. I just like Cats n dogs n mice n' stuff. I'd never wear a fursuit, not even of a monkey.

The definition of animal-lovers and furries is becoming less different, yiffer is the term for people who sexualize it in a sparse pocket of the internet, but the inclination to avoid association with that term is one I'd deem wise because most people will say furry for 'people who like animals too much'.

I was grown up on Disney, yes I think the beast is charming more so as a beast than he is in human form. Is that a furry thing? No, not really. In his Beast Form he could convey a lot more expression than his human form could, I also found Lumiere, Cogsworth and Miss Potts more charming as sentient objects. Mostly because Humans are boring in comparison to the absurdity of a Candelabra who talks.

Had they been human all throughout the film, I'd have had no objections. The Humans were only present in the last 5 minutes of the film, however.

Though I think the beast was also much easier to get a kick out of because most of his time as a Beast was spent throwing hilarious tantrums like this one.

Oh right, this is a screenshots thread. Sorreh!

author=Liberty
Oh man, watching these kids react to Back to the Future II is making me feel old. orz

Nevermind that 2 days from now is when Marty McFly and Doc Brown 'arrive' in 2015. Crazy...

And it's gonna be just as real as that video of them as depicted by Rick n' Morty.

The fantastical idea of the future being some metropolitan utopia is a pipe dream at best. No doubt, we have done some cool invention, but nothing like we imagined.

A lot of this can be blamed on America's outrageous military budget which in turn means NASA, the minds behind the space age technology we could be using right now, they get only 1% of America's wealth for advancement, so while they are still doing incredible things, it takes a lot of time because they are so horribly underpaid, and these are the guys who could make the need for a military redundant in the first place.

And even with so much of the country focusing on defending themselves from an imminent terrorist attack brought on by people who hate them because they raped their country and stripped away their rights in the pursuit of fossil fuels that continually ruin this planet. America still couldn't protect itself.