RADNEN'S PROFILE
Radnen
1806
I like to make video games, especially action RPG's.
I make games slowly. Call me slow. But quality is always better than quantity!
Moo.
I make games slowly. Call me slow. But quality is always better than quantity!
Moo.
Search
Filter
Idea: "Like"
So about this Wikileaks thing...What do you think?
author=Feldschlacht IVBarack's birth certificate, for example.we have a comedian, guys
If it were real why is it not on wiki leaks? Or is it that it's impossible to find? WikiLeaks can prove things y'know, not harm them. If Wikileaks proved Obama's nation of birth, then it'd just increase his support and convert many people (including some republicans who ain't so stubborn). Likewise it could harm his reputation if otherwise.
Why believe in a falseness? What if there was a truth? This is the goal of WikiLeaks. Support it.
So about this Wikileaks thing...What do you think?
I saw a colbert report episode on the guy who made the initial leaks about certain American activities, and he believes that there was nothing in them that destroyed America. The documents basically said we went into Vietnam on dumbass reasons (kinda like how the Iraq war started in 2001) and that we lost the war by mismanaging our troops and killing innocents and what-not. Big whoop, people knew this for a long time, but now have a real reason to believe they were right.
America ain't perfect. If there is a single document that can destroy America bring it on, until then I'm just going to sit at hope making video games and drink my soda as I enjoy this Christmas break from college. America ain't that weak, and I'm confident that if the government wanted to hide something they'd do a highly secure and exceptional job at doing so: Barack's birth certificate, for example.
America ain't perfect. If there is a single document that can destroy America bring it on, until then I'm just going to sit at hope making video games and drink my soda as I enjoy this Christmas break from college. America ain't that weak, and I'm confident that if the government wanted to hide something they'd do a highly secure and exceptional job at doing so: Barack's birth certificate, for example.
The Perfect Debate
author=Jericho
This debate, perhaps unlike the ones you are used to, is for mature, not mealy-mouthed adults. Please read passively...
And my evidence that you are wrong:
author=Jericho
Not only this, but you like to eat poop. For breakfast. That's right. Heh. Poop. And you try to brush the poop stains out, but you can't! You can't get poop stains out! I believe I've made my point.
author=Jericho
NO YOU'RE THE STUPID JOKE
author=Jericho
I am not responsible for your inability to read between the lines, as perfect debaters have no such weakness..
:(
The Perfect Debate
author=Jericho
Actually, Superman and Goku's abilties are common knowledge to the upper echelon of society, which I believe I implied that this perfect debate was restricted to?
You gotta be kidding me! That has been the most engrossingly arrogant thing I have ever heard from anyone in my entire life.
Offtopic: SIG HEIL Motherfucker.
author=Jericho
Not only this, but you like to eat poop. For breakfast. That's right. Heh. Poop. And you try to brush the poop stains out, but you can't! You can't get poop stains out! I believe I've made my point.
CLAIM: You sir are not a debater and will never be one with arguments with such weak wit.
REASON: Good debaters do not debase others in public forum. They speak with an adherence to the guideline I represented above. And it has nothing to do with the warrant. My argument had nothing to do with the warrant either, but I regard it has a solemn warning that nobody here as formally debated anything including you.
EVIDENCE:
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/popcult/handouts/arguments/arguments.html
CONCLUSION:
Jericho can't formally debate.
author=Jericho
All perfect debaters enter the perfect arena with absolute knowledge concerning both sides of the argument before forming an opinion.
Back that up (I do know it's true, however, this is not common knowledge).
author=Jericho
How is "Goku can beat Superman with kryptonite" not a claim? Your ignorance of this topic is not my concern..
I said it's not a good argument. I did question if it was a claim. And yes, you do make one. There exists no evidence and very little reasoning. I was wrong here. But the example still stands.
The Perfect Debate
I know what debating is, and you can't make the baseline warrant a highly subjective object with fictitious claims; the reasoning becomes inconclusive: We will not have a "winner".
MY CLAIM: I have seen no arguments here.
MY REASON: an argument has three base components:
1. It must make a claim; These are usually ad hominems, or a hypothesis.
2. It must include a reason; a reason to an ad-hominem argument is a "gut feeling", for example.
3. And they need evidence; a quotation, image, physical object.
EXAMPLE 1 (Source):
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/popcult/handouts/arguments/arguments.html
EXAMPLE 2 (Evidence):
A bad example of an argument is this:
EXPOSITION:
It doesn't make a claim; the words "due to" or "because" are not present (for example). A claim is a verbal thesis statement. These here are just two mere statements (or observations).
It draws info from "prior knowledge", yet makes no effort to back it up with evidence; how can we trust you know what you are saying (even if it's fact). Superman and Goku's abilities are not common knowledge. It is likely that supporters of one super-person will only be supporters because they know more about that person than the other.
CONCLUSION:
This is not and has not been a debate, I'm sorry Jericho but this has been nothing more than a waste of time.
This has been the first real argument presented. It may be highly contested, it may have wrong info, it may suffer from lack of evidence, but it is nevertheless a true augmentative response.
MY CLAIM: I have seen no arguments here.
MY REASON: an argument has three base components:
1. It must make a claim; These are usually ad hominems, or a hypothesis.
2. It must include a reason; a reason to an ad-hominem argument is a "gut feeling", for example.
3. And they need evidence; a quotation, image, physical object.
EXAMPLE 1 (Source):
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/popcult/handouts/arguments/arguments.html
EXAMPLE 2 (Evidence):
A bad example of an argument is this:
I posit that Goku can easily acquire a piece of kryptonite using his Instant Transmission technique, bringing the fight to a quick end. Additionally, Goku's ki blasts may very well be a form of magic, another of Superman's weaknesses
EXPOSITION:
It doesn't make a claim; the words "due to" or "because" are not present (for example). A claim is a verbal thesis statement. These here are just two mere statements (or observations).
It draws info from "prior knowledge", yet makes no effort to back it up with evidence; how can we trust you know what you are saying (even if it's fact). Superman and Goku's abilities are not common knowledge. It is likely that supporters of one super-person will only be supporters because they know more about that person than the other.
CONCLUSION:
This is not and has not been a debate, I'm sorry Jericho but this has been nothing more than a waste of time.
This has been the first real argument presented. It may be highly contested, it may have wrong info, it may suffer from lack of evidence, but it is nevertheless a true augmentative response.
New Year's Resolutions
Game Drive Week 06
My community (Oniromancie)
I notice most art styles are drawn.
My game has original art, but I do it with pixel art. Does drawing it by hand make the process go any faster? I dunno, but it seems very effective.
My game has original art, but I do it with pixel art. Does drawing it by hand make the process go any faster? I dunno, but it seems very effective.













