RATTY524'S PROFILE

Eh...

EEEEEEEEEEEEeeehh...

Thanks for the review, I guess. To be honest, the fact that each comment was brief was this review's DOWNFALL.

On too many occasions you stated that something was "annoying" or "rage-inducing" without actually explaining why that part of the level was rage-inducing and annoying. Take this for instance:

Mysterious Flying Gentleman Lakitu by DarklordKeinor: I hate this level with a passion. Serious rage inducer here. F--K THIS LEVEL!!!

You say it's a serious rage inducer and you state that you hate it, but you don't tell us WHAT made you mad or WHY. Because of this, how do you expect the people who use these reviews to determine whether to give the game their time to care about anything you say? No offense, but Ancient Noob pulled off this style of reviewing way better than you have. It would have been better as a series of comments.

author=Fidchell
Then again, Pom Gets Wi-fi is filled with retarded 1337speak and is insanely popular, but I guess its "pretty" graphics mask the sad attempt to make the sort of humor it has appear satirical. It shouldn't be any more popular than this game.

The reason Pom gets the praise it received is because it actually had a purpose behind its retardedness. It is satirical because if you've actually played the game, it's poking fun at the flaws of internet culture.

This game has a similar ploy, only unlike Pom the gameplay aspect was given more thought, though it failed in that regard. If this game wasn't so needlessly difficult and was balanced better, it would have been great.

This is the review I agree with the most. This was a game not devoid charm, but it almost failed to be a game to begin with, as there was little depth involved. The score is right on the money.

Nice review as always, Addit! And yes, the boss doors are unlocked after getting a certain amount of stars, but if you find all the bonus levels along the way, you'd hardly ever notice.

Popular game gets a 2-star review, everyone goes "wtf" and starts a heated debate in the comments section. Classic.

author=eplipswich
You rate a game based on graphics, story, animation, gameplay, music and sound, all in one package, not just on one feature alone. The bulk of your review only focuses on gameplay, but you never weigh in equally the other features of a game.

Well gameplay is kind of a big deal... Because IT'S A GAME.

Regardless there are many things about this review that is vague and questionable. You wrote down a lot... but you were ultimately saying the same thing over again for every paragraph. Maybe I'll give this game a shot myself.