PSY_WOMBATS'S PROFILE

@Sooz/Frogge Yes, I realize that our win condition is "put all scum in the tea prison." Frogge being around is actively working against that. He can betray us in the endgame. Calling his shots means he'll never hit scum. If this game lasts four days, by lynching Frogge now we're effectively saving two town from getting poisoned. Especially when one of the town is CAVE (well, maybe, w/e) this is good lynch.

@Blob Because by immediately confirming themselves, they're proven innocent. This means that mafia will almost immediately nightkill them, because the less 100% innocent people around, the greater the chance that town kills one of their own.

Congrats Frogge. You're a detriment to town. Mafia now knows exactly who you're targeting so they can just block you if it's inconvenient. If it's convenient for them, 50% CAVE dies.

#lynch Frogge

I don't think you're scum but uhhh you're at minimum not town and your refusal to just kill someone randomly means you're basically actively sabotaging us at this point. Lynching you now will at least prevent Cave's death. I was going to say I'd advocate not lynching you if you could guarantee to us you'd be unpredictable in your nightkills but it seems that's impossible.

Sooz: He poses no threat to mafia at all if he calls his kills beforhand. The mafia has the power to roleblock via the spice salesman. If CAVE is scum, they will do just that: block him. Same goes for the next day. If mafia approves of his target, they let it slide. If they don't, they block. With his current strategy he will only ever kill town.

@Cave I don't think LockeZ's insistence on voting off unhelpful presumably town on day 1 is scummy. It's practically his mafia kayfabe at this point. While I have no reason to think LockeZ is innocent this is basically identical to how he played last game.

@piano Do you doubt Liberty's claim? If she's not the announcer as she says, the real announcer will out her tomorrow with ease. All she did was buy herself a day really. I still don't see much reason to doubt Frogge either.

@IF I'm still interested what changed your opinion about Frogge's second lynch vote. The rest of your stuff is believable, at least.

@Sooz: somehow, somehow that's not a scumtell

In the pandemic game, scum-piano put me on the defensive arguing with him for three straight days. Meanwhile I scumhunted the doctor and tried to set up a fork play on the SK and the vigilante.

re: Blob, I found his earlygame behavior strange when he suggested that an exposed breadcrumb meant we could trust seer 100% but that could've easily been a slipup by town. I would've found his vote against me a /lot/ more suspicious if Liberty was scum because he would've been attacking me purely for attacking her, but looks like that's not the case. If he is scum though, I think his attack on me would've served a purpose and I don't discount just paranoia. I still find IF more suspicious.

I'm still really leery of IF. He's changed his play almost completely from when I first called him out though but that could be either town or scum. What I didn't mention before was some word choice stuff (I wanted Ratty's response, he gave it). Calling Ratty's strategy retarded, "lmao" to defend against my accusation, and that earlygame "you gun get lynched" at Cap without trying to stop what was happening. Something I noticed playing last game was that I was a lot more inclined to trash fellow scum (calling Kloe terrible town, Ratty's behavior idiotic, etc) and just in general be more abrasive because I knew I'd never need to lobby those people for their cooperation. IF played diplomatically in that game and he's playing more like that now but it still struck me as very very strange. A Ratty/IF team would not surprise me .

Although I also find Ratty's gameplan pretty bad though. "Scum would never intentionally act so suspicious like this~" is not at all convincing. It reads like you're giving yourself cover because you'll be behaving differently. And you'd only really need to radically change your behavior if you rolled scum again. I'm also surprised he didn't react a little more strongly to having it called "retarded." Backing up the (suspicious) Blob and going after the (now mostly vindicated) Liberty doesn't help.

@piano I focused on you because you're making a play, whether you perceive it as that or not, and I'm a bit sensitive about it because of what happened in the pandemic game. I'm still not 100% just because it makes me worried when a strong player claims to not be working towards their win condition. I double-checked the rules about butter spreader immediately after I posted that "why do you think they show up beforehand" message and realized they were a day action. The second post about the timing was a trap to see if you'd try to mislead me about it, but you called me out instead.